human il 27 (Sino Biological)
Structured Review

Human Il 27, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human il 27/product/Sino Biological
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Interleukin-27 remodels the bone marrow niche to suppress B-cell development and leukaemia progression in mouse models"
Article Title: Interleukin-27 remodels the bone marrow niche to suppress B-cell development and leukaemia progression in mouse models
Journal: eBioMedicine
doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2026.106239
Figure Legend Snippet: IL-27 impairs early B-cell development in the bone marrow. (A) Experimental scheme for AAV-mediated IL-27 delivery and analysis of splenic and BM B-cell compartments. (B–D) Splenic B-cell analysis 10 weeks after AAV-Ctrl or AAV-IL-27 treatment (n = 2 per group). (B) Frequency of total splenic B cells. (C) CIBERSORTx-based deconvolution of splenic B-cell subsets, including clustering and pseudotime analysis (left) and relative subset distribution (right). (D) Cd93 expression (TPM) in splenic B cells. (E–G) Analysis of splenic and BM B-cell compartments 3 weeks after treatment (n = 4 per group). (E) Representative flow cytometry plots. (F) Frequencies of B220 + CD19 − and B220 − CD19 + populations in the BM and spleen. (G) Relative distribution of B-cell developmental subsets in the BM. (H–I) Kinetics of B-cell populations following IL-27 treatment (n = 2 per group at each time point). (H) Frequency and absolute number of BM B220 + B cells. (I) Proportions of B-cell subsets within the B220 + compartment at the indicated time points. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ns, not significant; unpaired Student's t-test.
Techniques Used: Cell Analysis, Expressing, Flow Cytometry
Figure Legend Snippet: Exogenous IL-27 inhibits CLP formation in the bone marrow. (A) qPCR analysis of B-lineage- and myeloid-associated transcription factors in BM cells 5 days after AAV-Ctrl or AAV-IL-27 administration (n = 3 per group). (B) qPCR analysis of CEBPA expression in Reh cells treated with hIL-27 and DAC for 3 days (n = 3 per group). (C–D) Frequencies and absolute numbers of CLPs in WT and CD19 Cre ;IL-27R fl/fl mice (n = 3 per group). (E–F) BM B-cell frequency (E) and proportion of B220 + CD43 hi IgM − B cells (F) in WT and CD19 Cre ;IL-27R fl/fl mice 2 weeks after AAV treatment (n = 3 for WT Ctrl group; n = 3 for WT IL-27 group; n = 3 for CD19 Cre Ctrl group; n = 4 for CD19 Cre IL-27 group). (G–H) BM B-cell frequency (G) and proportion of B220 + CD43 hi IgM − B cells (H) in CD4 Cre ;IL-27R fl/fl and Lyz2 Cre ;IL-27R fl/fl mice 2 weeks after AAV treatment (n = 3 for CD4 Cre Ctrl group; n = 3 for CD4 Cre IL-27 group; n = 5 for Lyz2 Cre Ctrl group; n = 6 for Lyz2 Cre IL-27 group). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ns, not significant; unpaired Student's t-test.
Techniques Used: Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: Exogenous IL-27 reshapes immune reconstitution after bone marrow transplantation. (A) Experimental scheme. WT mice underwent BM transplantation followed by AAV-Ctrl or AAV-IL-27 treatment. Splenic and BM immune reconstitution was analysed at 10 weeks after treatment (n = 4 mice for the Ctrl group; n = 5 mice for the IL-27 group). (B) Percentages and absolute numbers of CD45 + splenocytes. (C–F) Frequencies of major immune cell populations within CD45 + splenocytes: myeloid cells (C), macrophages (D), T and B cells (E), and NK cells (F). (G) Frequency of CD4 + T cells among splenic T cells. (H) Proportion of Tregs among CD4 + T cells. (I–J) BM B-cell reconstitution. Frequency of BM B220 + B cells (I) and distribution of B220 + B-cell subsets (J). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ns, not significant; unpaired Student's t-test.
Techniques Used: Transplantation Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: IL-27 inhibits B-cell development through both direct and indirect mechanisms. (A) Schematic of the BM chimera model. WT (WTR) or IL-27R −/− (KOR) recipients were treated with AAV-Ctrl or AAV-IL-27. Donor BM cells were a 1:1 mix of WT (CD45.1 + ) and IL-27R −/− (CD45.1 − ) cells. Analyses were performed at 5 weeks (B–E; n = 3 per group) or 10 weeks (F–I; n = 5 per group) post-transplantation. (B) Percentage of CD19 + B cells from CD45.1 + or CD45.1 − (IL-27R −/− ) donors in spleen and BM of WTR and KOR mice. (C) Absolute numbers of total CD19 + B cells in spleen and BM of WTR and KOR mice. (D) Absolute numbers of CD19 + B cells from CD45.1 + or CD45.1 − (IL-27R −/− ) donors in spleen and BM of WTR and KOR mice. (E) Percentage of B220 + CD19 − B cells from CD45.1 + or CD45.1 − (IL-27R −/− ) donors in BM of WTR and KOR mice. (F) Absolute numbers of B220 + CD19 - B cells from CD45.1 + or CD45.1 - (IL-27R −/− ) donors in BM of WTR and KOR mice. (G) Frequencies and absolute numbers of BM B220 + B cells derived from CD45.1 + or IL-27R −/− donors in WTR mice. (H) Proportion of CD43 hi IgM − subsets from CD45.1 + or IL-27R −/− donors in BM B220 + B cells in WTR mice. (I–J) Frequencies of CLPs (I) and their donor-specific contributions (J) in BM chimeras. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ns, not significant; unpaired Student's t-test.
Techniques Used: Transplantation Assay, Derivative Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Exogenous IL-27 indirectly inhibits BM B-ALL cells. (A) Experimental design. GFP + B-ALL cells were transferred into WT mice, followed by AAV-Ctrl or AAV-IL-27 administration. BM and splenic B-ALL cells were analysed 9–10 days later (n = 3 per group). (B–C) Representative flow cytometry plots and quantification of GFP + B-ALL and GFP − B cells. (D) GSVA analysis of transcriptional changes in BM B-ALL cells isolated from mice in (A). (E) Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of DEGs between Ctrl and IL-27 groups in (A) (adjusted P < 0.05, |log 2 fold change| > 1). The outer ring indicates enriched GO terms, the middle ring represents relative gene expression changes in the IL-27 group, and the inner ring shows background gene counts, with colour intensity reflecting enrichment significance. Enriched pathways include interferon-γ-mediated signalling, interferon-β responses, adhesion-related processes, protozoan defence responses, calmodulin-dependent kinase signalling, and negative regulation of STAT tyrosine phosphorylation. (F–G) Expression of apoptosis- and cell cycle-related genes in BM B-ALL cells from (A). (H) Experimental design. WT and IL-27R −/− mice transplanted with GFP + B-ALL cells were treated with AAV-Ctrl or AAV-IL-27 (n = 4 for WT Ctrl group; n = 4 for WT IL-27 group; n = 5 for IL-27R −/− Ctrl group; n = 5 for IL-27R −/− IL-27 group). (I–J) Representative flow plots and quantification of BM B-ALL cells. (K–L) Flow cytometry plots and quantification of BM B-ALL cells in CD4 Cre ;IL-27R fl/fl , CD19 Cre ;IL-27R fl/fl , and Lyz2 Cre ;IL-27R fl/fl mice (n = 2 for CD4 Cre Ctrl group; n = 2 for CD4 Cre IL-27 group; n = 3 for CD19 Cre Ctrl group; n = 3 for CD19 Cre IL-27 group; n = 3 for Lyz2 Cre Ctrl group; n = 3 for Lyz2 Cre IL-27 group). (M) Flow cytometry plots and quantification of BM B-ALL cells in Rag1 −/− mice (n = 3 per group). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ns, not significant; unpaired Student's t-test.
Techniques Used: Flow Cytometry, Isolation, Gene Expression, Phospho-proteomics, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: IL-27 reshapes the BM niche, reducing B-cell support and leukaemogenesis. (A) Pseudotime analysis of BM B-cell subsets (C0–C10). (B) Expression of representative marker genes across B-cell clusters in (A). (C–G) BM cells were harvested 8 days after AAV-Ctrl or AAV-IL-27 administration for RNA-seq analysis (n = 3 per group). (C) CIBERSORTx analysis showing increased pre-pro-B and cycling pro-B subsets after IL-27 treatment. (D) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis highlighting alterations in adhesion-related pathways. (E–F) Heatmaps of transcription factors (E) and adhesion molecules (F). (G) RNA-seq analysis of genes shown in the figure in BM cells. (H) RNA-seq analysis of genes shown in the figure in human MSCs with or without hIL-27 treatment (n = 2 per group). (I) qPCR analysis of genes shown in the figure in murine MSCs with or without IL-27 (n = 3 per group). (J) RNA-seq analysis of genes shown in the figure in BM Gr-1 + cells 3 weeks after AAV-Ctrl or AAV-IL-27 administration (n = 2 per group). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ns, not significant; unpaired Student's t-test.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Marker, RNA Sequencing
Figure Legend Snippet: IL-27 exhibits therapeutic potential while modulating B-cell compartments. (A–B) Experimental design of combination therapy in WT (A) and Rag1 −/− (B) mice, with corresponding Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. (C–D) Experimental design of IL-27R −/− CAR-T cell therapy combined with AAV-Ctrl or AAV-IL-27 in B-ALL-bearing mice, with Kaplan–Meier survival curves. B-ALL cells were transplanted either prior to chemotherapy (C) or after chemotherapy (D). (E–F) NSG mice transplanted with human G-PBSCs were injected intramuscularly with AAV-Ctrl or hIL-27. 10 days later, frequencies and absolute numbers of B cells in the BM and spleen were analysed (n = 5 per group). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ns, not significant; log-rank test (A–D) and unpaired Student's t-test (E–F).
Techniques Used: Injection
